WEBVTT

00:02.735 --> 00:03.410
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: So, why is this important?

00:03.440 --> 00:05.760
Well, freshwater inflows
are a critical input to

00:05.760 --> 00:07.400
high-functioning bays
and estuarine systems.

00:07.730 --> 00:11.165
Human extraction and impoundment
upstream diminishes these flows,

00:11.165 --> 00:13.640
and this is exacerbated by the fact that

00:13.640 --> 00:16.610
during the drought human needs persist.

00:16.610 --> 00:16.800
Right.

00:16.820 --> 00:20.000
We still impound and make
extractions upstream in

00:20.000 --> 00:23.450
the years when flows are
diminished down to a trickle.

00:24.470 --> 00:28.440
As many of you may or may not
know, water is pretty expensive.

00:28.440 --> 00:31.010
Inexpensive water in the state,

00:31.010 --> 00:35.699
particularly if it's Ag Water or duck
water is about $30 an acre-foot.

00:35.699 --> 00:39.190
The problem is if you buy duck water or Ag

00:39.190 --> 00:41.510
water in a year like the year we just had,

00:41.900 --> 00:44.430
they will not make
second-crop water available.

00:44.450 --> 00:47.810
You will not be able to take
water for the environment at

00:47.810 --> 00:51.560
the time when the environment
most critically needs the help.

00:52.850 --> 00:56.070
To circumvent that, we
have started to execute

00:56.070 --> 00:58.350
farm water contracts for the environment.

00:58.350 --> 01:01.490
So, we come to the table
representing the environment

01:01.730 --> 01:03.680
and are treated or expect to be treated

01:03.830 --> 01:06.050
in the same fashion that a municipal user

01:06.050 --> 01:08.360
would be or an industrial user would be.

01:08.630 --> 01:11.209
The downside of that is we generally pay

01:11.750 --> 01:15.350
quadruple to quintuple duck water rates.

01:16.250 --> 01:18.860
The benefit of that is
in a year like this,

01:19.130 --> 01:22.576
we bought 200-acre feet of farm water.

01:22.576 --> 01:27.319
We bought 292 feet of
farm water that flowed

01:27.319 --> 01:29.280
down through the Highland
Lakes, hopefully,

01:29.280 --> 01:32.420
provided some riverine
benefits on the way to

01:32.420 --> 01:35.320
give us 200-acre feet
at our diversion point.

01:35.320 --> 01:39.020
And we will we were able to
put 200-acre feet of water on

01:39.020 --> 01:42.242
the ground at the Mad Island
Marsh Preserve in July.

01:42.242 --> 01:44.220
At the height of the drought,

01:44.220 --> 01:46.910
I was able to visit
the site and it was literally

01:47.090 --> 01:50.870
teeming with life where that
environmental water was on the ground.

01:51.080 --> 01:53.960
And then that water,
the boards get pulled and it can

01:53.960 --> 01:57.320
flow into the bay for
some salinity regulation.

01:58.670 --> 01:59.825
There's no way possible.

01:59.825 --> 02:02.930
And this is a lot of the work that
Paul has been thinking through,

02:03.860 --> 02:05.960
that I can ever buy enough water to affect

02:05.960 --> 02:08.300
salinity across an entire bay.

02:08.300 --> 02:13.130
Hopefully, I can buy enough
water and deploy it at

02:13.130 --> 02:18.020
the right place at the right
time to provide some refugia

02:18.169 --> 02:21.770
so that we may see natural
systems rebound more quickly

02:21.770 --> 02:23.900
than they would have
if left to their own devices.

02:24.770 --> 02:27.440
This project, we're doing
in concert with TNC.

02:27.440 --> 02:29.360
Obviously, it's their property down there.

02:29.600 --> 02:32.045
Ducks has helped us along the way.

02:32.045 --> 02:34.460
And I'm happy to report
that this has really

02:34.940 --> 02:36.650
created a blossoming relationship

02:36.650 --> 02:38.540
with the Texas Water Development Board,

02:38.540 --> 02:41.089
Kemmy, Kevin, Melissa, the whole team.

02:41.089 --> 02:43.490
They have been really helpful.

02:43.730 --> 02:47.600
They've loaned us a couple of ISL signs

02:47.600 --> 02:49.280
so that we can actually track salinity.

02:49.280 --> 02:51.680
And we're on the precipice of collecting

02:51.680 --> 02:53.990
the data to see if we can actually

02:53.990 --> 02:58.970
see the salinity change as a result
of us releasing that freshwater.

02:59.120 --> 03:02.700
And then hopefully we'll be able to
get an idea of how far out we're

03:02.700 --> 03:05.570
maybe effecting that change
and then really begin to understand

03:05.570 --> 03:08.300
the relationship between
the volumes of water and what we

03:08.300 --> 03:12.270
can hope to achieve in terms
of providing that refugia.

03:12.830 --> 03:15.500
There is actually a video
out that was produced

03:15.500 --> 03:16.770
by the Water Development Board.

03:16.770 --> 03:20.456
It may be in their press room, newsroom.

03:20.456 --> 03:24.120
But I'm sure they can tell you where
it is at the end of this call.

03:24.120 --> 03:26.490
But I would encourage that you see it.

03:26.490 --> 03:31.220
Water Development Board videographer
came out, (INAUDIBLE) came out.

03:31.400 --> 03:35.120
Kevin was there, TNC was
there, water trade was there.

03:35.120 --> 03:37.430
And it really kind of walks you
through what it looks like.

03:37.610 --> 03:38.810
Really a well-done piece.

03:38.840 --> 03:40.380
I was happy to be a part of that.

03:40.380 --> 03:42.660
So, how does Texas Water Trade work?

03:42.680 --> 03:48.890
Well, I cannot be a subject matter
expert in every kind of microclimate.

03:48.890 --> 03:51.320
Texas is a vast place.

03:51.650 --> 03:57.080
We work in West Texas, we
work in Galveston, Matagorda.

03:57.350 --> 03:59.600
We are expanding our
footprint along the coast.

03:59.600 --> 04:04.925
We are working in Hill Country
to relocate drinking water.

04:04.925 --> 04:09.650
Well, hopefully down dip at
Jacob's Well to mitigate

04:09.860 --> 04:12.020
some of the streamflow
impacts that occur when they

04:12.020 --> 04:17.290
turn that pump on because
it's diminishing flows into

04:17.290 --> 04:19.220
Cypress Creek that then
feed into Jacob's Well.

04:19.220 --> 04:22.055
So, we work in a lot of
places in the state.

04:22.055 --> 04:26.195
Understanding that I can't be
an expert everywhere or about everything,

04:26.195 --> 04:29.330
we have the Texas Water
market makers program.

04:29.630 --> 04:35.839
We put an RFP out, we take proposals,
we evaluate them and basically,

04:36.380 --> 04:37.940
like in the case of Galveston Bay,

04:38.180 --> 04:40.960
Galveston Bay Foundation
does excellent work.

04:40.960 --> 04:43.550
Bob over there really runs a tight ship.

04:44.120 --> 04:46.670
But historically they've
done a lot of conservation

04:46.850 --> 04:49.940
through preservation
or through acquisition.

04:50.240 --> 04:53.239
They knew that the water
piece was important

04:53.239 --> 04:55.279
but they didn't necessarily have

04:55.460 --> 04:59.390
the in house expertise to begin to
incorporate that in their portfolio.

04:59.390 --> 05:03.360
So, they submitted a proposal
to be a water market maker.

05:03.660 --> 05:06.630
The selectees get a commitment from us to

05:06.630 --> 05:09.120
provide two years of material support,

05:09.120 --> 05:11.844
help them develop a community of practice.

05:11.844 --> 05:14.490
Funding is needed, technical support,

05:14.730 --> 05:17.729
representation at local
meetings, council meetings.

05:17.729 --> 05:21.000
Galveston Bay Council, for
example, we help them figure out

05:22.440 --> 05:25.290
how much the water should cost,
where it could come from.

05:25.470 --> 05:27.029
If we need to get a permit amendment,

05:27.029 --> 05:28.770
we can get them connected with appropriate

05:28.770 --> 05:33.180
legal expertise and also financing
strategies to get them there.

05:33.180 --> 05:36.120
In addition to the water
market makers program,

05:36.480 --> 05:38.609
we also have a Texas flows fund.

05:38.609 --> 05:42.450
You do not have to be in the market
makers program to apply for this.

05:42.990 --> 05:45.960
We expect that most people
who are in the market

05:45.960 --> 05:48.779
makers program would but it's actually

05:48.779 --> 05:52.890
a bucket of money that is
dedicated to buy environmental

05:52.890 --> 05:55.270
water for various organizations.

05:55.270 --> 05:57.779
So, you come in as a market maker,

05:57.930 --> 06:00.740
we figure out how much water you
need, where can we source it?

06:00.740 --> 06:01.800
How can we deliver it?

06:02.040 --> 06:03.270
How much is it going to cost?

06:03.450 --> 06:05.279
And then we'll give you the money to buy

06:05.279 --> 06:08.380
the water to get your
project off the ground.

06:08.380 --> 06:12.810
This is really, I think one
of the things I like about

06:12.810 --> 06:16.215
it is that it is
conservation in partnership.

06:16.215 --> 06:20.400
For example, Galveston Bay
Foundation, TNC and TWT,

06:20.400 --> 06:25.020
we all worked together in
a joint grant application

06:25.020 --> 06:26.700
to the Knobloch Family Foundation.

06:26.700 --> 06:30.029
And we have worked together
to get this environmental

06:30.029 --> 06:32.835
water where it needs to be.

06:32.835 --> 06:36.960
Not just the parties that
are kind of primary drivers

06:36.960 --> 06:40.589
of the work but we need
other conservation groups,

06:40.589 --> 06:44.190
landowners, water sellers,
foundations, academic partnerships.

06:44.940 --> 06:47.940
It is really a community of practitioners

06:47.940 --> 06:50.745
that enable this work to happen.

06:50.745 --> 06:54.224
And I think that that may
be the best approach.

06:54.224 --> 06:56.760
The environmental problems we face are

06:56.760 --> 06:59.430
so daunting that they are too much

06:59.430 --> 07:04.110
for any individual or any individual
organization to handle alone.

07:04.350 --> 07:07.670
And it's by establishing
these teams of teams,

07:07.670 --> 07:10.140
by bridging gaps between disciplines

07:10.230 --> 07:13.140
and working together that we can
really come up with results,

07:13.290 --> 07:15.150
I think that are greater
than any one of our

07:15.150 --> 07:18.010
groups could put together on their own.

07:18.010 --> 07:20.610
So, for our case study
today we'll talk a little

07:20.610 --> 07:23.190
bit about what's happening
in Galveston Bay.

07:23.700 --> 07:26.115
We have two projects
going in Galveston Bay.

07:26.115 --> 07:28.980
One on the east side where
we are procuring water

07:29.190 --> 07:31.770
from the Chamber's Liberty
Navigation District.

07:31.950 --> 07:35.010
And then one on the West Bay
where we are working towards

07:35.010 --> 07:38.100
procuring water from
the Gulf Coast Water Authority.

07:39.180 --> 07:41.730
Here is the West Bay project site.

07:42.360 --> 07:43.994
This is Halls Bayou.

07:43.994 --> 07:46.920
It's just southwest of Bayou Vista.

07:46.920 --> 07:48.870
The property is pretty large.

07:48.870 --> 07:52.275
They own outright, I think they
own in fee about 15,000 acres.

07:52.275 --> 07:58.020
And they have another 10,000 acres
under their control via leases.

07:58.020 --> 08:01.980
And on the map there you see
a lot of yellow and green.

08:01.980 --> 08:04.980
But the red area is where
we think the primary

08:04.980 --> 08:07.480
impact area of our water is going to be.

08:07.480 --> 08:10.785
So, this water is going to come
through Gulf Coast Water Authority,

08:10.785 --> 08:12.614
a lot of what we do on the coast.

08:12.614 --> 08:15.607
Luckily, we've got kind of legacy
irrigation infrastructure.

08:15.607 --> 08:19.650
So, we're able to utilize
existing levees and canal systems

08:19.800 --> 08:22.270
to divert and deliver water
where we want it to go.

08:22.270 --> 08:26.680
That big blue area in
the middle is an onsite

08:26.680 --> 08:28.680
reservoir and we have
control of the water.

08:28.680 --> 08:32.070
From there, we can pull
boards and that water will

08:32.070 --> 08:34.920
flow down through that
light baby blue area.

08:34.920 --> 08:36.832
I don't know if you can
see my mouse there,

08:36.832 --> 08:40.230
into the red area where we expect
to be the primary zone of impact.

08:40.530 --> 08:44.580
And then you will notice
four red rectangles.

08:44.880 --> 08:47.452
Those rectangles moved from
the northeast to the southwest.

08:47.865 --> 08:52.780
We have used NRCS soil mapping
information to kind of say,

08:52.780 --> 08:56.160
the soil type at
the northeast mimics that at

08:56.160 --> 08:58.542
the northwest
or (INAUDIBLE) the southwest.

08:58.542 --> 09:01.590
So, the idea is we are going to set up

09:01.590 --> 09:04.860
a monitoring station at the control

09:04.860 --> 09:08.579
site to the Northeast and then
the treatment site to the Southwest.

09:08.579 --> 09:13.710
And we want to see what
kind of ecological uplift

09:13.710 --> 09:17.309
we are providing via
the delivery of water.

09:17.520 --> 09:21.490
We have money ready to deploy
to buy up to 1,000-acre-feet

09:21.490 --> 09:23.550
from Gulf Coast Water Authority.

09:23.550 --> 09:26.310
It's interesting to note,

09:26.310 --> 09:30.329
on the east side of the bay
I'm paying $30 an acre-foot.

09:30.329 --> 09:33.810
When we get into competition
with the industrial complex,

09:33.810 --> 09:37.530
we are price takers, we
are not price makers.

09:37.800 --> 09:43.386
Water over there on the west side
costs closer to $135 an acre-foot.

09:43.386 --> 09:46.050
So, your money doesn't go quite as far.

09:46.050 --> 09:48.870
But we have funds on hand to
buy 1,000-acre feet of water.

09:49.920 --> 09:52.679
We're going to use salinity meters,
I already have them deployed.

09:52.679 --> 09:56.700
I've got salinity onset Hobo
salinity meters deployed

09:56.940 --> 10:01.059
in a string down those
various treatment plots

10:01.059 --> 10:04.020
so that we can track
the salinity gradient as that

10:04.020 --> 10:07.160
freshwater pulses moves
through the system.

10:07.160 --> 10:10.400
Ideally, I think with my
next tranche of funding,

10:10.580 --> 10:13.220
I'm going to try to elevate the monitoring

10:13.220 --> 10:15.770
piece to allow for telemetry.

10:15.770 --> 10:19.940
So, I can incorporate
adaptive management from my

10:19.940 --> 10:23.060
telephone or anywhere
else that I want to work.

10:23.060 --> 10:27.110
So, when we see certain salinity
triggers hit, we can pick up the phone,

10:27.260 --> 10:30.545
make the water call, send
a pulse down through the system.

10:30.545 --> 10:34.670
The way it is now, I have to go
out in the field which isn't bad.

10:34.670 --> 10:36.010
I enjoy it.

10:36.010 --> 10:40.370
But it's starting to get to
if you want to be scaled,

10:40.640 --> 10:42.890
you either need a larger
workforce or you need

10:42.890 --> 10:44.960
to be able to rely on remote sensing.

10:45.140 --> 10:47.610
And that's kind of where
we're trying to take this.

10:47.610 --> 10:50.150
So, how do we do it?

10:50.150 --> 10:55.319
During my graduate work,
I was working on nonlinear

10:55.319 --> 10:58.802
modeling systems to think
about pricing water.

10:58.802 --> 11:00.920
Random forests, neural networks.

11:00.920 --> 11:04.189
I was working with Dr
Philip to sew on this.

11:04.189 --> 11:07.280
And part of that, particularly
when I was thinking through

11:07.309 --> 11:09.890
ecosystem services
marketplaces, I thought,

11:09.890 --> 11:13.190
if you want to understand the ecosystem

11:13.190 --> 11:15.920
services afforded us by a forest,

11:15.920 --> 11:19.700
let's say, we need to know what
the composition of that forest is.

11:19.700 --> 11:23.464
I can send somebody out
there to count the trees

11:23.464 --> 11:27.770
but wouldn't it be cool if
I could use object detection,

11:27.770 --> 11:31.429
object classification to just
fly a drone through the forest,

11:31.670 --> 11:35.819
run the video footage through
an AI object detection

11:35.819 --> 11:38.369
system and have it count the trees for me?

11:38.369 --> 11:38.660
Right.

11:38.990 --> 11:43.689
And that idea has been kind of
niggling and pulling in my mind.

11:43.689 --> 11:47.450
So, as we began to roll
out this water piece,

11:48.290 --> 11:52.230
we were thinking in terms of how
are we going to monitor for,

11:52.230 --> 11:55.400
to track if we are actually impacting

11:55.400 --> 11:57.540
the land in a measurable, meaningful way.

11:57.540 --> 12:00.530
One thing I think we're going
to do for coastal carbon

12:00.740 --> 12:03.590
is measure carbon sequestration
rates pre and post,

12:03.590 --> 12:05.480
in both treatment and control sites.

12:05.750 --> 12:07.190
After a couple of years of data,

12:07.190 --> 12:12.710
I should be able to model
what the carbon sequestration

12:12.710 --> 12:17.497
rates become by the addition of
freshwater if there's anything.

12:17.497 --> 12:21.070
The hypothesis is more water
should equal more vegetative

12:21.070 --> 12:24.059
biomass should equal more rootstock.

12:24.059 --> 12:29.179
So, if we can prove to landowners
that they are sequestering

12:29.179 --> 12:31.550
additional carbon by
participating in these programs,

12:31.700 --> 12:33.559
it might be another care route to dangle

12:33.740 --> 12:35.194
to get more landowner participation.

12:35.194 --> 12:36.530
But we'll see.

12:37.309 --> 12:41.960
What I was really interested in is
seeing if I can show that the bird

12:41.960 --> 12:46.410
use changes based on the addition
of the environmental water.

12:46.410 --> 12:49.040
So, I've got a network
of game cameras set up.

12:49.040 --> 12:53.900
I've got about 26 of them, roughly,
let's see, eight to 24 of them.

12:54.140 --> 12:58.486
There's three cameras at each site
both for control and treatment.

12:58.486 --> 13:02.809
I've got them synchronized to take
pictures every 10 minutes to make

13:02.809 --> 13:06.470
sure that we're not duplicating any
bird count in any given moment.

13:06.470 --> 13:06.740
Right.

13:07.010 --> 13:10.190
For birds in picture A,
and you see a bird in picture B,

13:10.340 --> 13:13.290
they clearly must be separate birds.

13:13.290 --> 13:15.470
So, we're taking a lot of pictures.

13:15.470 --> 13:17.870
I think we're taking
60,000 pictures a month.

13:18.200 --> 13:22.220
And I've set up a dashboard
that uses object detection.

13:22.220 --> 13:25.040
And we'll get into that to
actually count the birds for us.

13:25.309 --> 13:28.350
And we also procured
some micro song meters

13:28.350 --> 13:31.059
from the ornithology lab up at Cornell.

13:31.059 --> 13:35.210
The recorder kicks on when it hears a song

13:35.360 --> 13:36.980
and then it stays on for an hour.

13:37.160 --> 13:39.530
I can process those audio
files in a similar

13:39.530 --> 13:42.410
fashion whereby the audio goes

13:42.410 --> 13:46.790
through and I can actually identify
species and count the individuals.

13:47.480 --> 13:50.450
Also, we have salinity meters as
I mentioned deployed along the sites.

13:52.059 --> 13:53.300
We've got the game cameras out.

13:53.320 --> 13:55.179
We're taking about 100,000
pictures a month.

13:55.450 --> 13:57.495
And then I put together
this little time-lapse.

13:57.495 --> 13:59.679
So, here's what it looks
like when you string

13:59.679 --> 14:12.545
together some of these pictures in a row.

14:12.545 --> 14:25.020
For me to collect this much data
I cannot live in the marsh.

14:25.170 --> 14:28.668
You know, it ain't easy being green
but I'm no friend with the frog.

14:28.668 --> 14:31.860
So, this is a way for us
to get super large amounts

14:31.860 --> 14:35.100
of data at very cost-efficient ways.

14:35.370 --> 14:38.790
And also I think, if we can
accumulate enough of these

14:38.790 --> 14:42.630
pictures with proper species
identification and store

14:42.630 --> 14:47.460
them in a repository we can
end up then being the bird

14:47.460 --> 14:50.400
identification library for
the coastal band anyway.

14:51.720 --> 14:55.102
I did set up this to
play but it's not very

14:55.102 --> 14:59.035
loud but let's see if you can hear it.

14:59.035 --> 15:05.500
Sadly, you get some
wind noise quite a bit.

15:05.530 --> 15:07.210
My next iteration is going to have some

15:07.210 --> 15:08.920
buffers on his mics to prevent that.

15:10.130 --> 15:13.304
But it's pretty cool to sit in
and kind of eavesdrop on nature.

15:13.304 --> 15:16.340
Sadly, sorry, the audio on
that just didn't come through

15:16.340 --> 15:18.278
loud enough but I'm happy
to share it offline.

15:18.278 --> 15:18.596
OK.

15:18.596 --> 15:21.582
Let's see how I skipped
to the next thing here.

15:21.582 --> 15:22.145
OK.

15:22.145 --> 15:23.840
So, here's what we're doing.

15:24.050 --> 15:25.520
Here's what the dashboard looks like.

15:26.780 --> 15:34.130
Every frame is analyzed by
the dashboard and it can identify

15:34.130 --> 15:36.890
if there is something there
or there is not something there.

15:36.890 --> 15:39.530
So, we're trying to
optimize the efficiency

15:39.710 --> 15:41.525
of accuracy in abundance numbers.

15:41.525 --> 15:46.310
This way when I then compare pre and post

15:46.310 --> 15:48.890
data from treatment and control sites,

15:49.130 --> 15:52.790
I should be able to demonstrate
if there's a statistical difference

15:53.030 --> 15:56.807
in the use of the wetted lands
versus the nonwetted lands.

15:56.807 --> 15:59.810
I know that just kind of like if we use

15:59.810 --> 16:02.390
artificial structure to attract fish,

16:02.810 --> 16:07.160
you know, are we helping abundance
or are we acting as an aggregator?

16:07.400 --> 16:09.020
I'm kind of thinking my way through that.

16:09.020 --> 16:12.500
But if more groups are
congregating together,

16:12.860 --> 16:17.620
there probably is an increased
chance for higher recruitment.

16:18.170 --> 16:20.520
But I'm still kind of working
my way through that.

16:20.520 --> 16:25.460
On the East Bay, this is Anahuac
National Wildlife Refuge.

16:26.060 --> 16:28.910
In this case, we've got
5,000 acre feet of water.

16:29.060 --> 16:30.830
We've already got an under contract.

16:31.040 --> 16:33.500
And in this case, we're really
trying to give ourselves

16:33.770 --> 16:37.250
ecological flexibility when
it comes to the management.

16:37.250 --> 16:40.520
So, we can call for this
water in any fashion

16:40.520 --> 16:42.935
we choose over the next four years.

16:42.935 --> 16:45.230
So, we could take it all in one year.

16:45.680 --> 16:48.275
We just called for 2,000
acre feet of water.

16:48.275 --> 16:51.740
But part of that is because
we're about to enter into

16:51.740 --> 16:54.080
the scaled up effort where
I'm going to have access,

16:54.350 --> 16:57.910
it looks like to 2,000 acre feet a year,

16:57.910 --> 16:59.477
every year for the next 10 years.

16:59.477 --> 17:01.550
So, we don't mind being
a little more aggressive

17:01.550 --> 17:03.410
with the execution of this contract.

17:03.410 --> 17:06.530
Again, relying on the old
legacy infrastructure,

17:06.530 --> 17:08.159
there was a lot of rice
production in the area.

17:08.159 --> 17:10.430
So, we're using these moist soil units

17:10.700 --> 17:13.790
as artificial personal reservoirs.

17:13.790 --> 17:17.440
And then we can pull the boards or punch

17:17.440 --> 17:19.700
of cut into there and then drain it

17:20.210 --> 17:24.560
through the Bayou as salinity levels
indicate that we think we want to.

17:25.310 --> 17:28.160
Although now we're starting
to scale up so that

17:28.160 --> 17:30.260
the volumes of water are getting bigger,

17:30.500 --> 17:33.230
the land coverage will be getting bigger.

17:33.230 --> 17:37.280
We have permission now
to operate on Anahuac.

17:37.280 --> 17:39.725
I have to fill out a special use permit.

17:39.725 --> 17:43.160
And we will be executing
similar data gathering

17:43.160 --> 17:46.390
for the birds on site at that location.

17:46.400 --> 17:47.900
I'm super excited about that.

17:48.230 --> 17:50.240
Eventually, I'd like to
see this go up and down

17:50.240 --> 17:54.320
the coast as environmental
conditions dictate.

17:55.190 --> 17:58.490
And looking to scale this
up soon and it looks

17:58.490 --> 18:01.092
like that's really right on the horizon.

18:01.092 --> 18:03.100
Other places, we work with LCRA.

18:03.100 --> 18:05.660
I mentioned that farm water
contracts for the environment.

18:05.900 --> 18:10.460
We were really pleased for them
to be willing to engage us

18:10.640 --> 18:13.220
and execute farm water
contracts for the environment.

18:13.430 --> 18:15.050
I thought it was a watershed moment

18:15.050 --> 18:18.200
and I think that we can see that continue.

18:18.890 --> 18:20.935
Hill Country protect Jacob's Well.

18:20.935 --> 18:23.450
We just executed in West Texas,

18:23.450 --> 18:26.060
the first ever at least from
a nonprofit standpoint.

18:26.960 --> 18:29.510
We cost-shared an irrigation efficiency

18:29.510 --> 18:32.180
improvement project where the largest

18:32.180 --> 18:35.892
pecan producer in the state was
going to put some land into flood.

18:35.892 --> 18:38.180
We said, hey wait, why don't you consider

18:38.180 --> 18:40.070
using high-efficiency sprinklers?

18:40.460 --> 18:46.700
We will cost share it with you
provided you agree to forbear

18:46.700 --> 18:49.000
the use of that water
and leave it in the aquifer.

18:49.000 --> 18:51.650
So, a forbearance agreement
to protect groundwater

18:51.650 --> 18:55.145
in place for the first
time I think in the state.

18:55.145 --> 18:59.020
This can be viewed as
a round or a pardon me,

18:59.020 --> 19:01.410
drinking water supply protection fund.

19:01.410 --> 19:05.270
And ideally, if we could get
rademakers or water utilities

19:05.510 --> 19:08.300
or groundwater districts that are charging

19:08.359 --> 19:11.150
pump fees to peel off
some of that revenue,

19:11.450 --> 19:13.670
put it into our source
water protection fund,

19:13.940 --> 19:16.820
use that fund to enable
your irrigation efficiency

19:16.820 --> 19:19.160
improvements with the provision that

19:19.160 --> 19:21.530
you can only access this
fund if you are willing

19:21.530 --> 19:22.980
to enter into forbearance agreements.

19:22.980 --> 19:25.220
I think then in arid parts of the state,

19:25.369 --> 19:29.480
we might be able to kind
of monetize or incentivize

19:30.109 --> 19:32.660
the movement towards more conservation

19:32.840 --> 19:33.379
and it can be self-funding,
self-fulfilling.

19:35.330 --> 19:39.320
This coastal work while
the corporate offset money is nice

19:39.320 --> 19:44.740
and it has been an exciting
development and I think it can scale.

19:44.740 --> 19:47.510
Ultimately, the people that benefit from

19:47.510 --> 19:49.260
this water are coastal communities.

19:49.260 --> 19:53.600
So, I would like to see us
approach municipalities,

19:53.600 --> 19:56.300
county commissioners about the possibility

19:56.300 --> 19:57.800
of peeling off some of their

19:57.800 --> 20:02.020
hotel occupancy tax to pay for
these environmental flows because,

20:02.020 --> 20:05.150
well, healthy environments,
I think tacitly

20:05.150 --> 20:07.149
make healthy people and happy people.

20:07.149 --> 20:09.930
But we can draw a line between
the tourism industry,

20:09.930 --> 20:13.300
the birdwatching groups,
the recreational anglers.

20:13.450 --> 20:17.619
And if we can prove up that
the environmental flows help sustain

20:17.619 --> 20:20.750
and enhance those opportunities
which lead to tourism dollars,

20:20.750 --> 20:23.380
there's no reason why these
coastal municipalities

20:23.590 --> 20:26.109
shouldn't be buying their
own environmental water.

20:26.590 --> 20:28.900
My next step from the bird stuff,

20:28.900 --> 20:33.909
I'm about to work in conjunction
with A&M to develop passive lidar

20:33.909 --> 20:37.030
that we can deploy underwater
to begin to attract

20:37.030 --> 20:39.450
the aquatic response
to freshwater inflows.

20:39.450 --> 20:41.859
I would really like to be able to draw

20:41.859 --> 20:44.200
linkages to the fish hatch and then

20:44.200 --> 20:46.630
I can begin to potentially approach

20:46.630 --> 20:48.820
the commercial fishery if I can correlate

20:48.820 --> 20:50.830
that to bank limits to show to them

20:50.830 --> 20:52.510
the commercial value of these freshwater

20:52.510 --> 20:57.130
inflows and get them to hopefully
help pay to foot the bill.

20:58.150 --> 21:00.190
That's really I think all I had today.

21:01.030 --> 21:02.507
I'll turn off screen share.

21:02.507 --> 21:06.060
We've got some time I think
for questions or discussions.

21:06.070 --> 21:11.390
I'm happy to take some or just
open the floor for discussion.

21:11.390 --> 21:13.110
However, you normally run these games.

21:13.110 --> 21:15.168
It is totally up to you.

21:15.168 --> 21:16.991
SPEAKER: Thank you, Quinn.

21:16.991 --> 21:18.380
That's a great presentation.

21:18.410 --> 21:18.560
Yeah.

21:18.560 --> 21:21.680
If anybody has a question,
feel free to raise

21:21.680 --> 21:24.667
your hand or drop something in the chat.

21:24.667 --> 21:28.430
I'd be more than happy
to read it out for you.

21:28.430 --> 21:30.760
It looks like we already have
somebody with their hand raised.

21:30.760 --> 21:36.780
Dave, (INAUDIBLE).

21:36.780 --> 21:39.080
SPEAKER: It's David Brad's, been on mute.

21:39.840 --> 21:40.660
SPEAKER: Oh, I'm sorry.

21:40.660 --> 21:42.286
SPEAKER: No, that's quite alright.

21:42.286 --> 21:43.332
Two David's.

21:43.332 --> 21:47.330
Quinn, this was very exciting to
hear all the work you're doing.

21:47.330 --> 21:52.490
It's nice to see it coming to fruition
after the last couple of years.

21:52.820 --> 21:57.650
I had a couple of questions on, just
curious about the water depths,

21:57.740 --> 22:00.860
kind of the West Bay
versus the East Bay sites.

22:00.860 --> 22:04.640
Just from the photos, the West
Bay site looked like it was

22:05.960 --> 22:10.850
a drier environment and then
the East Bay had more open water.

22:10.850 --> 22:14.875
But that may have just been
the perspective from those locations.

22:14.875 --> 22:19.859
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Sorry, I hit David's name when
I was supposed to hit mine.

22:19.859 --> 22:22.190
So, Kevin, whatever I did can
you please try to undo it?

22:22.190 --> 22:22.875
If I muted him.

22:22.875 --> 22:23.092
Alright.

22:23.092 --> 22:24.449
I don't know what I did.

22:24.449 --> 22:27.210
But yeah, good point.

22:27.210 --> 22:27.885
And interesting.

22:27.885 --> 22:30.869
The East Bay, it appears that it's going

22:30.869 --> 22:35.080
to be more of fill the impoundment or

22:35.080 --> 22:37.990
wet the impoundment and a foot let's say,

22:37.990 --> 22:40.050
leave it and then drain as needed.

22:40.050 --> 22:42.900
But if we're in breeding season
we probably won't drain it all

22:42.900 --> 22:47.550
the way because it could disrupt
some nesting activities.

22:47.550 --> 22:53.070
The West Bay side is kind of more
of a rambling marsh complex.

22:53.070 --> 22:56.310
They own it all the way
from, I don't know,

22:56.310 --> 22:58.950
20 feet up at the street level all

22:58.950 --> 23:01.909
the way down to where it becomes marsh.

23:01.909 --> 23:09.000
So, that has a lot more title
interaction that is directly

23:09.000 --> 23:11.880
interfacing right there
with the open water.

23:11.880 --> 23:13.480
It goes right up to the open water.

23:13.480 --> 23:17.430
So, in that case, I think on
the west side the water is going

23:17.430 --> 23:20.180
to kind of trickle through
the system and over the landscape.

23:20.180 --> 23:23.369
And in the case of the East
Bay, because we've got these

23:23.369 --> 23:27.510
really clearly defined previously
existing impoundments,

23:28.140 --> 23:31.680
it'll be, we fill a depth maybe
it was a foot or two feet.

23:32.100 --> 23:34.763
I think in preliminary
discussions with the folks

23:34.763 --> 23:37.619
in Anahuac if we can get
them three feet deep,

23:37.890 --> 23:41.220
we begin to put enough weight
on there that it actually

23:41.220 --> 23:45.180
will help stave off
the influence of invasives.

23:45.570 --> 23:50.280
One thing we're really managing for
is that when we put this water out,

23:50.609 --> 23:53.160
it can create another, you know,

23:53.400 --> 23:55.469
it's the law of unforeseen consequences.

23:55.469 --> 23:57.750
We can often help invasives.

23:57.750 --> 24:00.200
And then we've got to
manage for another issue.

24:00.200 --> 24:03.240
So, we're feeling our way
through that right now.

24:03.810 --> 24:06.180
I think they've got a couple of
impoundments we're going to be using.

24:06.390 --> 24:09.129
I wouldn't mind trying water at
a couple of different depths.

24:09.129 --> 24:11.093
But that water, we're
going to wet the land,

24:11.093 --> 24:12.590
put it on the impoundment hold it.

24:12.590 --> 24:15.150
And then if we see salinity
levels begin to spike,

24:15.480 --> 24:17.010
that's when we'll just drain them.

24:17.010 --> 24:18.480
And then I'll make another water call to

24:18.480 --> 24:21.240
refill them as we're able to do that.

24:21.420 --> 24:24.869
And the West Bay is more of like
a broadcast trickle approach

24:24.869 --> 24:26.955
kind of over the landscape
through the system.

24:26.955 --> 24:27.449
SPEAKER: Yeah, exciting.

24:27.449 --> 24:30.666
And it may interesting to see the results

24:30.666 --> 24:32.575
just by comparing the two sides.

24:32.575 --> 24:35.430
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yeah, it's landscape-scale
ecology and I mean,

24:35.430 --> 24:37.350
we're running landscape-scale
experiments now.

24:37.710 --> 24:39.896
I'm really excited to see
how this shakes out.

24:39.896 --> 24:40.165
SPEAKER: Yeah.

24:40.165 --> 24:42.960
Are y'all doing any tracking
of the vegetation just to see

24:42.960 --> 24:46.935
if there is already different
vegetative responses?

24:46.935 --> 24:48.180
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Excellent question.

24:48.230 --> 24:49.859
Yeah, we're flying drones.

24:49.859 --> 24:53.455
I'm taking drone footage at pre,

24:53.455 --> 24:59.469
rather than have the drone fly in
a pattern and take a lot of pictures.

24:59.469 --> 25:03.840
I encounter problems sometimes when these

25:03.840 --> 25:06.550
pressure waves come in off the ocean.

25:06.550 --> 25:10.220
I get variable altitude which
can then affect the analysis.

25:10.220 --> 25:15.090
So, we've switched to taking
randomly selected point samples.

25:15.420 --> 25:17.220
We've run the drone footage pre,

25:17.220 --> 25:20.720
we will then run it post and then
we will compare the differences.

25:20.720 --> 25:25.572
So, that is in the process
but it'll be a slower return on data.

25:25.572 --> 25:26.004
SPEAKER: Yeah.

25:26.004 --> 25:26.436
OK.

25:26.436 --> 25:26.868
Great.

25:26.868 --> 25:27.973
Thank you, Quinn.

25:27.973 --> 25:28.218
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yes, sir.

25:28.218 --> 25:29.040
Thanks for being here.

25:29.040 --> 25:30.804
It's good to see you.

25:31.536 --> 25:31.780
SPEAKER: Yeah.

25:31.780 --> 25:32.024
SPEAKER: Alright.

25:32.024 --> 25:36.412
Next up, we have a question from Carter.

25:36.412 --> 25:37.975
SPEAKER: Hey, Quinn.

25:37.975 --> 25:41.850
Thanks for the invite, really enjoyed it.

25:43.470 --> 25:46.080
My question is a sort of
a follow-up to the last one.

25:47.190 --> 25:53.480
It seems like when things are
dry and salinities are going

25:53.480 --> 25:58.910
up also correlates pretty
highly with the times where

25:58.910 --> 26:04.100
you'd want to have water in
the inland freshwater areas as

26:04.100 --> 26:06.419
well either on the moist
soil unit or something else.

26:06.419 --> 26:10.609
So, how do you balance those
two needs knowing that,

26:10.760 --> 26:12.260
you know, we want to get
it out to the estuary?

26:12.740 --> 26:14.600
But given that, how dry it is,

26:14.600 --> 26:16.399
we also kind of want to
keep it on the landscape

26:16.399 --> 26:22.100
as one of the few inland freshwater
sources available at the time.

26:22.550 --> 26:24.050
What's the balance there?

26:24.050 --> 26:27.619
Have you had problems with landowners that

26:27.619 --> 26:29.150
get the water or partners that get

26:29.150 --> 26:31.130
the water that are then
reluctant to let go

26:31.130 --> 26:33.824
of it when they might need it the most?

26:33.824 --> 26:37.540
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yeah, that's why we follow
the rule of life and marriage.

26:37.560 --> 26:37.890
Right.

26:37.890 --> 26:39.432
It's all about balance and compromise.

26:39.432 --> 26:42.450
Yeah, it's contractually,
we put it in there

26:42.450 --> 26:43.905
that the landowners have to pull the plug.

26:43.905 --> 26:46.650
But we also give them
the provision that we will replace

26:46.650 --> 26:48.680
that water to the extent that we are able,

26:48.680 --> 26:50.970
I mean, we're trying to be good partners.

26:51.359 --> 26:53.490
But at full disclosure, Carter is with

26:53.490 --> 26:55.270
the International Crane Foundation

26:55.270 --> 26:59.320
who is actually our most recent
addition to the market makers program.

26:59.320 --> 27:02.250
So, Carter, I'm going to
spin it back on you and say,

27:02.250 --> 27:03.850
that's up to you to decide.

27:05.010 --> 27:08.130
I can't be an expert in
every micro geography

27:08.130 --> 27:12.045
and knowing how vast and varied Texas is,

27:12.045 --> 27:14.970
those are decisions I think
we'll make in concert.

27:15.900 --> 27:21.119
But I would kind of give you
the more votes in the equation.

27:22.109 --> 27:26.800
You know, metering is great.

27:26.800 --> 27:30.410
It triggers are good for contracts.

27:30.710 --> 27:34.850
But if we know that there is
a looming tropical depression.

27:34.850 --> 27:38.180
If we hit a salinity number that normally

27:38.180 --> 27:40.310
would cause us to trigger a release,

27:41.300 --> 27:44.109
we need to be able to employ
common sense at the same time.

27:44.119 --> 27:44.520
Right.

27:44.520 --> 27:48.650
And leaning on our subject matter
experts and the institutional

27:48.650 --> 27:53.630
knowledge that you and ICF
or GBF or whoever we partner with,

27:55.070 --> 27:57.619
I'm a big believer in process and we have

27:57.619 --> 27:59.060
the right butts in the right seats.

27:59.270 --> 28:05.869
And I'm willing to trust to a quorum
of experts to make these decisions.

28:05.869 --> 28:07.460
And we generally do it as a team.

28:07.460 --> 28:09.830
So, there's no hard and fast rule.

28:09.830 --> 28:12.530
We manage for the maximum
ecological uplift

28:12.890 --> 28:14.830
without totally alienating partners.

28:14.840 --> 28:17.359
I guess is now I sound like a politician,

28:17.359 --> 28:19.400
but it's the most honest
answer I can give you.

28:19.400 --> 28:21.230
I mean, we'll do it together.

28:21.230 --> 28:21.710
SPEAKER: Yep.

28:21.710 --> 28:22.490
Fair enough.

28:23.960 --> 28:24.275
Thanks, Quinn.

28:24.590 --> 28:25.220
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yes, sir.

28:33.600 --> 28:35.226
SPEAKER: Does anybody have any more questions

28:35.226 --> 28:41.026
you'd like to discuss or talk about?

28:41.026 --> 28:43.388
Bring up.

28:43.388 --> 28:47.730
SPEAKER: We have a question in the chat.

28:47.730 --> 28:50.124
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yeah, the self-sustaining question.

28:50.124 --> 28:54.510
SPEAKER: Do you see the possibility or is
it your goal that the projects

28:54.510 --> 28:56.940
become financially
self-sustained in the future?

28:56.940 --> 29:00.180
Or will it stay relied on funding supports

29:00.180 --> 29:02.725
from outside sources or partners?

29:02.725 --> 29:03.920
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Great question.

29:04.940 --> 29:08.420
I don't think that these,
we could probably do

29:08.420 --> 29:11.030
small-scale projects
with foundation money,

29:11.030 --> 29:13.355
grant money, philanthropic money.

29:13.355 --> 29:18.140
But if you want to operate at
scale, I look at the money that

29:18.140 --> 29:22.610
we get to prove these concepts
simply as seed money.

29:23.120 --> 29:28.010
They are giving you a chance to prove
that this can work or cannot work.

29:30.710 --> 29:34.700
With that money, we need
to spin it up to scale

29:34.700 --> 29:36.810
and find ways that it
can be self-supporting.

29:36.810 --> 29:40.700
I think that that's our best
chance for long-term success

29:40.700 --> 29:44.885
and our best chance for
long-term ecological impact.

29:44.885 --> 29:49.850
To date luckily, it looks
like it's starting to work.

29:50.990 --> 29:53.330
I think part of that
and you know the monitoring

29:53.330 --> 29:54.830
piece isn't always really sexy.

29:54.840 --> 29:58.280
You know it's really fun
to get the money and start

29:58.280 --> 29:59.900
the project and put
a shovel in the ground.

29:59.900 --> 30:03.320
But I think it's really vital
that we show our funders

30:03.320 --> 30:04.970
what their money is actually getting them.

30:05.450 --> 30:11.660
Not only does it encourage those
funding streams to continue but it's

30:11.660 --> 30:15.470
very important for us to diversify
our portfolio of funders.

30:15.470 --> 30:18.890
And for us to be able to show people

30:19.040 --> 30:21.154
why these investments are important,

30:21.154 --> 30:23.500
we need to have some data to back it up.

30:23.500 --> 30:29.060
And I think once we start
thinking about county level

30:29.450 --> 30:32.180
or municipalities or county
level decision makers,

30:32.420 --> 30:34.340
there are governmental agencies that have

30:34.340 --> 30:36.790
access to buckets of money that I don't.

30:36.790 --> 30:40.910
So, I can use this seed
money to prove up a concept

30:41.060 --> 30:43.310
to take to those decision
makers and say, look,

30:44.390 --> 30:47.990
this benefits you and your
constituents and your

30:47.990 --> 30:50.540
community and is a worthwhile investment.

30:50.720 --> 30:54.140
Because if I can get that
level of buy-in then I think

30:54.140 --> 30:57.200
we can really get this thing
to be self-perpetuating.

30:57.200 --> 31:00.380
But I look at a lot of the money that

31:00.380 --> 31:04.370
we get as this is seed money to get

31:04.370 --> 31:07.340
out there and see if they can work
and show people how it can work.

31:07.700 --> 31:11.792
And then our obligation is to
take the next step to scale.

31:11.792 --> 31:12.848
SPEAKER: Alright.

31:12.848 --> 31:18.730
We got somebody else with their hand up.

31:19.010 --> 31:20.532
Peyton, do you want to hop on.

31:20.532 --> 31:24.140
SPEAKER: Hi, thanks for the presentation.

31:24.800 --> 31:30.320
I have a question regarding kind
of the longer-term plan and desire

31:30.680 --> 31:35.570
for regulating salinity spikes
in these estuarine environments.

31:35.570 --> 31:38.540
Assuming the program's successful
or expand and a lot of

31:38.540 --> 31:41.400
the initiatives that you've
discussed really take off.

31:41.400 --> 31:47.240
Is there an overarching
desire to minimize salinity

31:47.240 --> 31:50.060
variability in these
estuarine environments?

31:50.060 --> 31:53.150
And is that going to eventually
be coupled with some sort

31:53.150 --> 31:55.670
of analysis to look at
the ecological benefit of

31:55.670 --> 32:01.400
that natural capacity for
variability in driving ecosystem

32:01.400 --> 32:03.335
service development in these environments?

32:03.335 --> 32:06.146
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Man, that's a great question.

32:06.146 --> 32:09.085
I have another diplomatic answer.

32:09.085 --> 32:09.910
It probably depends.

32:09.920 --> 32:15.710
I mean, we can manage for what
would be a natural regime.

32:16.030 --> 32:16.430
Right.

32:18.230 --> 32:22.950
But I think at this point,
the whole earth is a managed system.

32:23.670 --> 32:27.360
We have lost our ability to
recreate a pristine environment.

32:27.360 --> 32:30.960
And based on impoundments and extractions,

32:31.230 --> 32:36.600
we will never fully get back
to a historic paradigm,

32:37.590 --> 32:41.780
pre-industrial ages or whatever
date you want to put on that.

32:41.780 --> 32:45.960
Now, we have to co-manage,
I think with human needs.

32:45.960 --> 32:46.350
Right.

32:46.350 --> 32:49.185
If we talked to Jenny Pollack,
I think it was on the call.

32:49.185 --> 32:53.490
There may be instances where we
want to regulate variability

32:53.490 --> 32:57.000
based on our aquaculture
because people need to eat.

32:57.000 --> 32:57.600
Right.

32:57.600 --> 33:01.620
There may be other systems where we have

33:01.620 --> 33:04.460
the luxury of only managing four

33:04.460 --> 33:12.310
to try to get some semblance of
that historical ecological picture.

33:12.310 --> 33:18.410
There are as many answers
as there are stakeholders.

33:18.420 --> 33:19.070
Right.

33:19.070 --> 33:21.970
I like to try to kind of follow,

33:21.970 --> 33:25.140
let's shoot for doing
what's best for the most.

33:25.440 --> 33:29.265
If we can satisfy the needs of
nature and the most stakeholders.

33:29.265 --> 33:31.380
It's kind of like
the Mick Jagger corollary,

33:31.380 --> 33:34.320
you may not get what you want
but you might get what you need.

33:35.460 --> 33:36.600
I mean, that's the secret sauce.

33:36.600 --> 33:36.855
Right.

33:36.855 --> 33:41.430
The delicate balance of how do
we meet the needs of nature

33:41.430 --> 33:46.440
and the oyster man who may
for sometimes want more

33:46.440 --> 33:48.540
salinity than we would give
them if we're forcing people

33:48.540 --> 33:50.410
to take freshwater in
the face of a hurricane.

33:50.430 --> 33:52.720
You know, that is really the trick.

33:52.720 --> 33:58.110
And I think that I'll never write
a definitive guidebook on that.

33:58.290 --> 34:00.360
I think we can only hope to improve our

34:00.360 --> 34:01.980
guidebooks of adaptive management.

34:02.790 --> 34:05.430
You know, the only constant is
change and we have to be willing

34:05.640 --> 34:09.802
to work with our partners
both from a naturalist

34:09.802 --> 34:13.646
perspective and economic
perspective like governmental

34:13.646 --> 34:18.353
perspective and find out what
everybody can live with.

34:18.353 --> 34:19.756
SPEAKER: Thanks.

34:19.756 --> 34:21.780
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: That's a hard question.

34:21.790 --> 34:25.428
That was a very good question.

34:25.428 --> 34:27.306
SPEAKER: Alright, go ahead.

34:27.306 --> 34:30.087
SPEAKER: Hey.

34:30.087 --> 34:36.800
Quinn, I've got a question for you.

34:36.800 --> 34:40.030
So, I know that you're
using instrumentation

34:40.030 --> 34:43.870
to measure the salinity and in things.

34:44.140 --> 34:51.610
Have you thought about a numerical
model to model the change

34:51.610 --> 34:55.428
in that freshwater pulse
down the marshes and so on?

34:55.428 --> 34:57.934
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: How did I know this would
come from you, Haven?

34:57.934 --> 35:01.270
Haven, I remember distinctly
a conversation I had

35:01.270 --> 35:03.190
with you at your desk,
when you said, you know,

35:03.190 --> 35:04.930
I wasn't sure that we were
going to actually be able

35:04.930 --> 35:07.710
to see it this far out
and by golly, it's there.

35:07.710 --> 35:10.870
So, we're going to get real data.

35:11.110 --> 35:16.570
And if you want to have
a conversation about using that or it

35:16.570 --> 35:19.390
might even be fun to kind of
ground truth a model against it.

35:20.350 --> 35:27.300
I think that the spatial scales
where we're deploying these Hobo

35:27.300 --> 35:33.350
salinity meters are not as long
as what you are looking at.

35:33.350 --> 35:37.030
I would be more than happy to
use Texas Water Development

35:37.030 --> 35:39.594
Board equipment and put
it wherever you want.

35:39.594 --> 35:44.840
For using the onset meters,
we're putting them kind of near

35:44.840 --> 35:47.410
shore where I can go get them
without losing all this gear.

35:48.370 --> 35:52.330
And if we see a response
at the close scale then

35:52.330 --> 35:54.210
we'll start putting them out spatially.

35:54.210 --> 35:55.690
Right And then we can.

35:55.700 --> 35:59.020
But yes, I thought about it.

35:59.140 --> 36:01.390
Luckily, I'm in a position
where I can collect real data.

36:01.390 --> 36:03.250
But I would love to share
with you and we could

36:03.250 --> 36:05.129
think through what that can look like.

36:05.129 --> 36:05.689
SPEAKER: Excellent.

36:05.689 --> 36:06.250
Yeah.

36:06.270 --> 36:08.270
No, I didn't want to put you on the spot.

36:08.280 --> 36:11.219
I do think that your expertise and your

36:11.219 --> 36:13.680
background that you have with finance,

36:13.980 --> 36:17.969
it just makes you perfectly suited to
doing what you're doing with this.

36:18.270 --> 36:20.925
And I think this is an excellent program.

36:20.925 --> 36:22.816
And you've done a great job.

36:22.816 --> 36:24.950
So, yeah, looking forward to having those

36:24.950 --> 36:27.600
kinds of conversations in the future.

36:27.600 --> 36:31.369
But the modelling with
this is difficult because

36:31.369 --> 36:34.020
you know when it's not just open water

36:34.350 --> 36:36.856
that when it's in marshes
and really complex

36:36.856 --> 36:41.150
systems then we have to try and scale.

36:41.150 --> 36:44.540
So, but yeah, I'm very
interested in the future.

36:44.540 --> 36:45.360
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Thank you so much.

36:45.360 --> 36:48.819
And it's funny, the board
specialized you get the more niche,

36:48.819 --> 36:52.100
the smaller the slot becomes and you
just kind of hope for the best.

36:52.100 --> 36:55.490
I wouldn't mention too I haven't,
we're in talks with Debbie Rod,

36:55.490 --> 36:57.825
a technology company that
has these little boxes,

36:57.825 --> 37:00.360
it's about as big as Rubik's Cube.

37:00.360 --> 37:04.010
Shoots passive lidar can detect
water changes to the millimetre

37:04.010 --> 37:07.770
level and can also adjust for
precip and has some title stuff.

37:08.070 --> 37:10.299
I think we might be putting
one of those in on a pilot.

37:10.299 --> 37:12.060
I'm thinking I'm going
to try to put it where

37:12.060 --> 37:13.420
I also have those salinity meters.

37:13.420 --> 37:17.910
it'd be really cool if I could
start to use that water ebb

37:17.910 --> 37:24.960
and flow and understand it
from a depth perspective.

37:25.110 --> 37:27.090
If I can begin to correlate
that to salinity

37:27.090 --> 37:29.160
then that could be a poor man's kind

37:29.160 --> 37:31.230
of back of the envelope
salinity calculation

37:31.410 --> 37:33.435
that I could, again use remotely.

37:33.435 --> 37:38.290
But that water data might help
enhance those modelling efforts.

37:38.290 --> 37:41.550
So, I'll see you down in
Puerto here pretty soon.

37:41.550 --> 37:48.605
We'll talk through this.

37:48.605 --> 37:59.795
SPEAKER: Somebody else have any more questions?

37:59.795 --> 38:12.270
That might have been it?

38:12.270 --> 38:12.890
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Nope.

38:12.890 --> 38:13.820
One more.

38:13.820 --> 38:15.110
SPEAKER: Go ahead, David.

38:15.110 --> 38:19.325
SPEAKER: As long as everybody's been
quiet, I'll go ahead and jump in.

38:19.325 --> 38:20.090
I'm just curious.

38:21.080 --> 38:22.790
I know you're monitoring
salinity at the site.

38:22.790 --> 38:26.530
Are there any other water quality
parameters, such as temperature and,

38:26.530 --> 38:31.772
I know DO is kind of difficult
because the membranes get foul but.

38:31.772 --> 38:32.484
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Yeah, yeah.

38:32.484 --> 38:33.380
Good question.

38:33.380 --> 38:35.359
Galveston Bay, no.

38:35.359 --> 38:38.900
However, luckily, we have gotten
the generous cooperation of

38:38.900 --> 38:42.752
the board down at the (INAUDIBLE)
and Marsh preserve site.

38:42.752 --> 38:44.945
So, actually I'll let
Kevin answer this one.

38:44.945 --> 38:45.300
SPEAKER: Yeah.

38:45.300 --> 38:48.390
So, those sites, there two
sides on the other side and

38:48.390 --> 38:51.460
the southern site and we are
measuring dissolved oxygen,

38:51.460 --> 38:54.885
temperature and pH in
addition to salinity.

38:54.885 --> 38:55.322
SPEAKER: OK.

38:55.322 --> 38:59.440
And is that a continuous monitoring
or kind of grab samples?

38:59.440 --> 39:02.382
SPEAKER: No, it's continuous.

39:02.382 --> 39:06.684
SPEAKER: OK, great.

39:06.684 --> 39:09.222
Great.

39:09.222 --> 39:17.960
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: I don't know if Paul's tuned in
or if he's kind of passively logged in.

39:17.960 --> 39:20.900
But Paul, if you're on, what do you think?

39:20.900 --> 39:22.670
I mean, this is focus flows.

39:22.670 --> 39:26.830
We're trying to roll it out
and scale it up and down the coast.

39:26.830 --> 39:28.920
SPEAKER: Yeah, I'm actually here.

39:28.920 --> 39:31.260
And Gwenn, thanks a lot for everything.

39:31.260 --> 39:36.297
It's great to see you, Texas
Water Trade's so successful.

39:36.297 --> 39:38.940
We've got so many good projects going on.

39:40.380 --> 39:43.469
At the end of the day,
I really think that what really,

39:43.469 --> 39:48.840
really matters is the climatic
gradient across the coastline.

39:49.739 --> 39:54.930
I think maybe if it's
an area that already has very

39:54.930 --> 39:58.650
high flows and plenty
of over-banking flows,

39:59.150 --> 40:02.630
it's not going to really matter
because the volumes are so small.

40:02.630 --> 40:07.260
But when you get to
the middle and lower part

40:07.260 --> 40:10.500
of the coast where the opposite is true,

40:10.680 --> 40:14.010
where we did literally draw
the environment up and destroy it,

40:14.880 --> 40:16.860
that's where it's going
to be super critical.

40:16.860 --> 40:23.623
And again, one of the concepts is that,

40:23.623 --> 40:33.910
if we can keep from killing
the bay then when conditions

40:33.910 --> 40:38.044
return to give a little bit below average

40:38.044 --> 40:41.950
in order to recover more quickly.

40:41.950 --> 40:49.620
So, if you think about a desert, for
example, why is a desert a desert?

40:49.630 --> 40:52.520
Well, it's a desert
because it never rains.

40:52.520 --> 40:56.350
And even when we have droughts,

40:56.350 --> 40:58.900
areas that are temperate that have lots

40:58.900 --> 41:05.150
of tall trees or water-loving plants,

41:05.989 --> 41:10.130
they do recover as long as the drought is

41:10.130 --> 41:12.530
not so long that it kills everything.

41:12.530 --> 41:14.280
There's something to recover.

41:14.280 --> 41:19.460
So, that's the real key here, is
trying to keep things around.

41:19.460 --> 41:24.130
So, the base can recover
from droughts naturally.

41:24.710 --> 41:26.489
But I also believe it is possible.

41:26.489 --> 41:28.610
I think we've proved it over the years

41:28.610 --> 41:33.025
and the (INAUDIBLE)
said he can kill a bay.

41:33.025 --> 41:37.700
We can start with so much that will
fundamentally change its nature

41:37.700 --> 41:43.540
and it won't support
the native complement of species.

41:43.540 --> 41:46.404
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Thank you, Paul.

41:46.404 --> 41:46.668
Alright.

41:46.668 --> 41:48.788
Then maybe I can pop in
and see what I've done there.

41:48.788 --> 41:51.980
And we can talk about what can be
done down in your neck of the woods.

41:51.989 --> 41:53.100
We'd love to work down there.

41:53.310 --> 41:54.450
You know, I call Jason.

41:54.719 --> 41:58.620
Interestingly, his inflows
are not impounded.

41:58.680 --> 41:58.930
Right.

41:58.930 --> 42:02.630
So, there's kind of naturally
occurring already over there.

42:02.630 --> 42:05.480
So, they don't necessarily
have the need for a project

42:05.480 --> 42:09.739
but maybe somewhere between
him and up in like Matagorda,

42:09.750 --> 42:11.690
you and I can talk about what we could do.

42:11.940 --> 42:13.760
We have to talk about
Townsend by you, too.

42:13.770 --> 42:18.049
That's James Dodson and that's
Carter has been on these calls.

42:18.049 --> 42:19.500
So, I'll catch up with you offline.

42:19.500 --> 42:21.198
And we can have that conversation.

42:21.198 --> 42:21.657
SPEAKER: Alright.

42:21.657 --> 42:22.662
Thanks again.

42:22.662 --> 42:24.357
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Thank you, sir.

42:24.357 --> 42:29.040
SPEAKER: So, Quinn, you had a site
and they're mentioning how many

42:29.040 --> 42:33.360
partners it takes in order
to do this type of project.

42:33.780 --> 42:38.489
And it is, I think,
extremely true for this.

42:38.489 --> 42:40.310
So, just a comment when
you said, you know,

42:40.320 --> 42:42.800
this is things that Paul's been worked on.

42:42.810 --> 42:45.150
I worked on some of this
kind of stuff on the math

42:45.150 --> 42:48.300
side when I was at Paul's
lab five years ago.

42:48.660 --> 42:52.379
And to kind of see this
idea come to fruition.

42:52.379 --> 42:55.680
And it's a way of when you
write a piece of science

42:55.680 --> 42:58.370
and then someone takes that
and builds on and builds on it.

42:58.370 --> 43:00.255
But then this is more than just science,

43:00.255 --> 43:05.020
this is policy, economics, psychology.

43:05.020 --> 43:08.670
And to see all these things
kind of come together,

43:08.670 --> 43:10.200
it's a monumental task.

43:10.500 --> 43:15.060
And so I just wanted to throw you
a comment and a compliment on that.

43:15.900 --> 43:18.120
You know, when Quinn had
that site about that,

43:18.120 --> 43:22.800
this takes so many of these
organizations to make this work.

43:23.070 --> 43:24.510
That is absolutely true.

43:24.780 --> 43:29.190
And being able to negotiate
all that and to get

43:29.190 --> 43:31.890
this to work for
the greater good, essentially.

43:32.610 --> 43:35.393
And so I think it's something
to really be proud of.

43:35.393 --> 43:39.476
It's so it's a really great, great
work that you're doing there.

43:40.058 --> 43:41.130
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Garren, you're too kind.

43:41.160 --> 43:42.219
Thank you so much.

43:42.219 --> 43:44.840
(INAUDIBLE) of the Great
Springs Project yesterday

43:44.850 --> 43:46.770
was speaking and he
goes, here's the trick.

43:47.460 --> 43:50.130
You don't need everyone
to want to work with you.

43:50.310 --> 43:53.610
You just have to avoid
creating people that say,

43:53.610 --> 43:55.290
I don't want that project to happen.

43:55.530 --> 43:55.820
Right.

43:55.830 --> 44:00.809
Like, it is very interesting exchange.

44:00.809 --> 44:01.739
Right.

44:01.739 --> 44:06.759
Between people that often
have conflicting objectives.

44:06.759 --> 44:09.979
It's kind of like finding
the Venn diagram of where's

44:09.979 --> 44:14.029
the spot that we can find
some measure of commonality.

44:14.029 --> 44:18.239
But at our core, I think that our
similarities outweigh our differences.

44:18.250 --> 44:19.950
So, let's think about those.

44:19.980 --> 44:20.330
Right.

44:20.340 --> 44:21.540
But thank you so much.

44:21.540 --> 44:24.330
I mean, everything's a team
effort and it's work you've done

44:24.330 --> 44:27.476
and Paul's done and David's done
and Dr Paul's done, I mean.

44:28.041 --> 44:33.780
SPEAKER: It's the beauty of that idea that
a small amount of water that

44:34.320 --> 44:37.620
doesn't cost a lot of money
can create a lot of good.

44:38.190 --> 44:44.100
And I think that that nugget is
really something that hits on,

44:44.880 --> 44:46.350
you know, across the board.

44:46.350 --> 44:46.980
So.

44:46.980 --> 44:50.085
SPEAKER: It looks like we have another question.

44:50.085 --> 44:54.180
Peyton, if you want to hop on.

44:54.180 --> 44:55.350
SPEAKER: Thanks again.

44:55.350 --> 44:58.370
Without prompting too much
of a legal easily answer,

44:58.370 --> 45:02.130
I'm curious about
the challenges you may face

45:02.130 --> 45:05.969
in securing the water that
you're purchasing from

45:05.969 --> 45:08.664
a water rights perspective for this water.

45:08.664 --> 45:13.260
So, we'll use being in stream
flows to bay and SRA systems.

45:13.590 --> 45:16.860
A lot of this water, it was
not originally authorized

45:16.860 --> 45:18.530
for that in terms of its beneficial use.

45:18.530 --> 45:20.250
So, I know you mentioned earlier that

45:20.250 --> 45:22.350
you got your own team of lawyers that

45:22.350 --> 45:25.720
help navigate perhaps needed permit
amendments or things like that.

45:25.720 --> 45:28.090
But I know the rules say
at the moment, you know,

45:28.110 --> 45:29.670
that water can't be specifically

45:29.670 --> 45:32.910
and solely authorized for
instream environmental

45:32.910 --> 45:36.450
flow uses and bay an estuary inflow.

45:36.450 --> 45:40.060
So, you have to get water that
has multiple authorizations

45:40.060 --> 45:43.700
but you're only using it for
a single purpose in the end.

45:43.700 --> 45:45.270
So, has that been challenging?

45:45.270 --> 45:51.360
Do you kind of confront that on
different landscapes between

45:51.360 --> 45:53.640
the different sources of
water that you buy from?

45:53.640 --> 45:58.160
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Well, I think the ledges said that
environmental use is beneficial use.

45:58.160 --> 46:04.824
So, like many duck for wildlife
use, duck water, Ag water.

46:04.824 --> 46:09.090
We don't typically buy Ag water
and try to end around the process.

46:09.810 --> 46:13.113
But duck water is certainly wildlife use.

46:13.113 --> 46:15.540
The amendment process is an onerous.

46:15.540 --> 46:17.160
It's a no-notice process.

46:17.460 --> 46:20.100
A lot of the river authorities
we deal with already have

46:20.100 --> 46:22.920
it in there as a provision,
a couple of do not.

46:22.920 --> 46:28.810
So, then the challenge is
you don't want to appear

46:28.810 --> 46:33.400
to raise the spectre of an obligation

46:33.400 --> 46:35.170
on their behalf to the environment

46:35.170 --> 46:36.560
if they go through the amending process.

46:36.560 --> 46:39.219
But the amendment process
is not that big of a deal.

46:39.219 --> 46:42.385
It's five or six grand to
get all the ducks in a row.

46:42.385 --> 46:44.380
But they have to file it.

46:45.370 --> 46:48.340
But we're happy to go through
that on their behalf.

46:48.530 --> 46:51.489
What's most important is a lot of
times even with groundwater users,

46:52.000 --> 46:57.340
again, they have this fear of we're
going to a use it or lose it.

46:57.700 --> 47:01.180
And if I lease it to you
for these purposes,

47:01.180 --> 47:04.480
does it count as used because
I don't want to lose it.

47:04.480 --> 47:07.300
Although I think going
through the sunset process,

47:07.300 --> 47:14.750
they just actually threw out
the ability of TCQ to reclaim,

47:14.750 --> 47:16.810
claw back any water right that hadn't

47:16.810 --> 47:18.486
been executed in the last 10 years.

47:18.486 --> 47:22.276
So, that's going to be
a real morass to navigate.

47:22.276 --> 47:26.830
But you know, a lot of it is just
about building trust and building

47:26.830 --> 47:29.860
relationships with these individuals
that are key decision makers.

47:30.190 --> 47:33.020
And you just keep showing up and you
do what you say you're going to do.

47:33.020 --> 47:36.310
The amendment process isn't that terrible.

47:36.400 --> 47:40.350
What would really be great
is if they would say,

47:40.350 --> 47:43.960
now that the ledge has authorized
this use as beneficial use,

47:44.290 --> 47:46.630
every permit that's already
been issued automatically

47:46.630 --> 47:47.860
has it in its four corners.

47:48.310 --> 47:51.280
That would prevent every
bright holder from

47:51.280 --> 47:53.200
having to go through this process to

47:53.200 --> 47:56.650
get their permit amendment amended for use

47:56.650 --> 47:57.850
that's already been deemed illegal.

47:57.850 --> 48:00.130
That seems like
an incredible administrative

48:00.130 --> 48:04.757
barrier that doesn't need to be there.

48:04.757 --> 48:06.576
SPEAKER: Thanks.

48:06.576 --> 48:08.394
SPEAKER: Alright.

48:08.394 --> 48:15.630
You're pretty close to an hour here now.

48:15.630 --> 48:17.730
So, does anybody have any
more questions they'd

48:17.730 --> 48:22.930
like to get to before we close out?

48:22.930 --> 48:25.969
Alright.

48:25.969 --> 48:28.604
Thank you, Quinn.

48:28.604 --> 48:30.840
DR QUINN MCCOLLY: Thank you for having me.

48:30.850 --> 48:32.190
I really appreciate you guys.

48:32.190 --> 48:32.490
SPEAKER: Yeah.

48:32.490 --> 48:35.910
And Quinn, I just wanted to say,
thank you so much for sharing

48:35.910 --> 48:39.180
your time with us today but also
your insights about some of

48:39.180 --> 48:42.239
the challenges and opportunities
that you and your team face

48:42.239 --> 48:45.090
in doing this important work
to secure environmental flows.

48:45.090 --> 48:49.739
And I just really appreciate your
vision for scaling up some of these

48:49.739 --> 48:53.489
projects for landscape-scale
conservation across the coast.

48:53.790 --> 48:57.799
It's really exciting work and definitely
gives me hope for the future.

48:57.799 --> 49:00.510
So, please keep up the good work.

49:00.510 --> 49:05.160
And we're happy and proud to support all

49:05.160 --> 49:06.750
your efforts with scientific monitoring.

49:06.750 --> 49:09.300
So, I also want to say
thank you to everyone in

49:09.300 --> 49:11.460
the audience who attended the event today.

49:12.000 --> 49:14.910
We appreciate your attention
and we hope you enjoyed it.

49:14.910 --> 49:17.880
And we'll aim to host
these estuary science

49:17.880 --> 49:20.710
exchange events two, three times of year.

49:20.710 --> 49:25.110
So, if you have any ideas for
topics that you'd like to discuss,

49:25.500 --> 49:26.310
please let us know.

49:26.310 --> 49:27.480
We're definitely open.

49:27.480 --> 49:31.340
And we look forward to sharing that
future fellowship with you all.

49:31.340 --> 49:34.455
So, I hope everyone has
a wonderful rest of your day.

49:34.455 --> 49:35.940
And we'll see you soon.

49:36.150 --> 49:37.140
Take care everyone.

49:38.430 --> 49:38.748
Bye.

49:38.748 --> 49:39.384
SPEAKER: Bye, bye.

49:39.384 --> 49:40.020
Thank you.
